检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘乃郗 蒋铭哲 LIU Naixi;JIANG Mingzhe(School of International Economics,China Foreign Affairs University,Beijing 100037,China)
出 处:《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第5期55-65,共11页Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:为研究地方政府的财政实际能力究竟是否存在一定的赤字,以及公共财政预算赤字决策等问题,将公共预算视作地方政府可通过财政征收力度来进行调控的内生变量,对中央与地方政府的财政收支进行分析。研究认为,在加入地方非公共财政预算收入后,发现地方财政实际能力并不存在赤字反而表现为盈余;与既往文献将公共财政预算收入作为与政府行为无关的外生变量不同,地方政府在制定财政决策时需要同时考虑“公共财政预算总收入与公共财政预算净收入”的短期权衡和“经济增长竞争与财政收入”的长期权衡,使得地方政府在短期权衡中偏向于调节财政征收力度实现最优而非财政预算收入最大化,在长期权衡中偏向于持续调控公共财政预算收入而保持公共财政预算赤字;双重权衡机制会扩大央地财政不平衡,在一定程度上影响中央财政的长期稳健和削弱地方公共财政预算支出增长的可持续性;应该进一步推进财政体制改革,寻找到央地财政关系的新平衡点,以适应新时代发展需求和保障财政能够始终成为经济发展的重大推动力。In order to study whether the actual fiscal capacity of local governments in China faces a deficit and the issues of fiscal deficit decision-making in the public budget,this paper considers public budgetas the endogenous variable which can be adjusted through the intensity of fiscal levy by local governments,and conducts analysis on the financial revenue and expenditure of central and local governments.According to the study,firstly,with the addition of the local non-public budget revenue,it is found that there would be a surplus instead of a deficit in the actual fiscal capacity of local governments.Secondly,different from regarding the public budget revenue as an exogenous variable unrelated to the government's behavior in previous literatures,this paper regards it as an endogenous variable.Based on the new assumption,it is found that local governments have to consider both the short-term tradeoff of"total public budget revenue vs.net public budget revenue"and the long-term tradeoff of"economic growth competition vs.financial revenue"while making fiscal decisions,which would urge local governments to be partial to moderating the fiscal levy intensity to achieve the optimal fiscal budget revenue rather than the maximum one in short-term tradeoff,and prefer continuously moderating the public budget revenue to maintain the public budget deficit in the long-term trade-off.Finally,the double tradeoff mechanism will aggravate the fiscal imbalance between the central government finance and the local government finance,affect the long-term stability of the central government finance and weaken the sustainability of local public expenditure growth to some extent.The paper suggests promoting the fiscal system reform and seeking the new balance point of the fiscal relationship between the central and the local governments,so as to meet the needs in new era and ensure the fiscal system always be the major impetus of economic development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.151.13