武术内外家之争:焦点、论点及其分水岭  

Conflict Between Inner and Outer Wushu:Focal Points,Arguments and Division

作　　者：田金龙 邱丕相[2] TIAN Jinlong;QIU Pixiang(Taichi Culture Institute,Handan College,Handan 056005,Hebei,China;School of Wushu,Shanghai University of Sport,Shanghai 200438,China)

机构地区：[1]邯郸学院太极文化学院,河北邯郸056005 [2]上海体育学院武术学院,上海200438

出　　处：《上海体育学院学报》2020年第11期13-17,共5页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(16BTY107)。

摘　　要：武术内外家的争论围绕1个焦点与3个论点展开。1个焦点即可乘与不可乘之争,3个论点即"主搏与主制""主动与主静""主外与主内"的辩论。通过对于技术思路、技术主张、方法运用、身体修炼等系列辩论的分析,从中国传统的体用关系出发,立足于"体"为"用"之本的角度定义了武术内外家的概念。提出:两家立论各有理论支撑,外家持体能论,内家持意识论,体能与意识的关系问题是两家在理论上的分水岭;外家追求"以大胜小",内家追求"以小博大",大与小的博弈问题是两家在技术上的分水岭。The conflict between the two groups of inner and outer Wushu(martial arts)has always centered around one focal point and three arguments.The focal point is on the dispute of loophole to be used and no loophole to be used;while the 3 arguments are offensive vs defensive,dynamic vs static,and outer vs inner.Through the analysis of the technological proposition,practical application and physical building,the inner and outer Wushu and defined from the perspective of ontology.With theoretical basis for both groups,the outer group holds the theory of physical endurance and the inner group believes the self-awareness,therefore the relation between physical endurance and self awareness is the theoretical division of the two groups.When the outer group pursues big can win small,or vise versa,the dispute between big and small size is their technological division.

关 键 词：武术 内家拳 外家拳 分水岭 武术理论 武术技术 

分 类 号：G852[文化科学—民族体育]