检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈淑梅 Chen Shu-mei
机构地区:[1]上海外国语大学国际金融贸易学院,上海200083
出 处:《亚太经济》2020年第5期52-59,M0005,共9页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“新时代中国参与全球贸易体系变革的前瞻性研究”的阶段性成果。
摘 要:美国将贸易与安全关联,对包括我国在内的外国商品和服务进行出口管制,将安全嵌入自由贸易协定,在加剧中美经贸摩擦的同时,正在危及世界贸易组织的生存。运用哥本哈根学派的"安全化"理论,分析美国将自由贸易与国家安全关联的案例,解构此轮中美贸易摩擦中美国贸易安全化的"三步曲",明确其"启动行为体""催化行为体"和"实施行为体"的不同分工,揭示美国对我国经贸问题安全化图谋。Employing trade-security nexus, the U.S. has successfully controlled exports of goods and services from foreign countries such as China, and embedded security into free trade agreements, catalyzing the on-going economic and trade friction between China and the U.S., as well as endangering the World Trade Organization. Analyzing what the U.S. did to our space commercial launch and the trade agreements signed between the U.S. and small economies in the past decade, the connection of free trade and national security by the U. S. becomes concrete, and underlying rationale for American interfering in our economy and trade can be traced back to history. From the trilogy of"non-market economy status","232 investigation"and"301 investigation"conducted by the U.S., what the U.S. has done can be peeled. Adopting securitization theory by the Copenhagen School, the American successful deployment of trilogy of securitization and their division of roles as initiating actor, catalyzing actor and implementing actor can be revealed together with their plotting purpose of securitizing Chinese economic and trade issues.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49