机构地区:[1]四川大学华西公共卫生学院/四川大学华西第四医院,成都610041 [2]西藏自治区疾病预防控制中心,拉萨850000 [3]成都市郫都区疾病预防控制中心,成都611700 [4]四川省疾病预防控制中心,成都610041
出 处:《预防医学情报杂志》2020年第10期1276-1284,共9页Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
基 金:四川省2017年艾滋病防治项目(项目编号:川卫办2016-2017ZJX01)。
摘 要:目的了解师范男生4种艾滋病防控生活技能现状及其影响因素,为有效预防艾滋病在学生中流行提供依据。方法采用分层整群抽样方法抽取某师范学院1380名男生进行问卷调查,使用SPSS 21.0软件对数据进行一般描述性分析、t检验、χ^2检验和多因素非条件Logistic回归分析,分析师范男生防艾生活技能影响因素。结果师范男生艾滋病防控风险识别、寻求帮助、协商和拒绝四种技能具备率分别为68.84%(950/1380)、60.07%(829/1380)、28.33%(391/1380)、26.30%(363/1380)。多因素非条件Logistic回归分析结果显示汉族(OR=1.55,95%CI:1.01~2.39)、不饮酒(OR=1.69,95%CI:1.08~2.65)、愿意进行HIV检(OR=1.41,95%CI:1.02~1.96)、客观支持(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.01~1.11)、主观支持(OR=1.04,95%CI:1.01~1.07)和支持利用(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.06~1.21)得分高等的师范男生艾滋病防控风险识别技能具备率更高;四年级(OR=2.45,95%CI:1.43~4.18)、出生于城镇(OR=1.40,95%CI:1.04~1.89)和城市(OR=1.60,95%CI:1.08~2.35)、正在恋爱(OR=1.40,95%CI:1.03~1.91)、主观支持(OR=1.03,95%CI:1.00~1.07)和支持利用得分高(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.16~1.32)的师范男生艾滋病防控协商技能具备率更高,不吸烟的男生(OR=0.67,95%CI:0.49~0.92)相对于吸烟者具有较低的艾滋病防控协商技能具备率;未去过娱乐场所(OR=1.33,95%CI:1.02~1.74)、客观支持(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.01~1.11)、主观支持(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.02~1.10)和支持利用得分高(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.11~1.28)的师范男生艾滋病防控拒绝技能具备率更高;三年级(OR=1.76,95%CI:1.28~2.42)、愿意进行HIV检测(OR=1.46,95%CI:1.02~2.09)、客观支持(OR=1.07,95%CI:1.02~1.12)、主观支持(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.02~1.10)和支持利用得分高(OR=1.20,95%CI:1.12~1.29)的师范男生艾滋病防控寻求帮助技能具备率更高。结论师范男生艾滋病防控协商和拒绝技能具备率处于较低水平,应重点针对出生于农村、一年级、饮酒、去过娱乐场所、从未恋爱过、不愿�Objective To understand the status and influencing factors of four life skills of AIDS prevention and control among male students in normal school so as to provide evidence for effective prevention of AIDS epidemic among students.Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1380 male students in a normal school by stratified cluster sampling.SPSS 21.0 software was used to conduct general descriptive analysis,Chi-square test and multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis of the data to explore the influencing factors of life skills of normal students in AIDS prevention.Results The four skills of AIDS prevention and control risk identification,seeking help,negotiation,and refusal of male students in normal school were 68.84%(950/1380),60.07%(829/1380),28.33%(391/1380)and 26.30%(363/1380)respectively.Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that Han nationality(OR=1.55,95%CI:1.01~2.39),non-drinking(OR=1.69,95%CI:1.08~2.65),willing to receive HIV test(OR=1.41,95%CI:1.02~1.96),good objective support(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.01~1.11),good subjective support(OR=1.04,95%CI:1.01~1.07)and high support utilization(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.06~1.21)were the promoting factors of male students’AIDS prevention and control risk identification skills.Grade four(OR=2.45,95%CI:1.43~4.18),town origin(OR=1.40,95%CI:1.04~1.89)or urban origin(OR=1.60,95%CI:1.08~2.35),being in love(OR=1.40,95%CI:1.03~1.91),good subjective support(OR=1.03,95%CI:1.00~1.07)and high support utilization(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.16~1.32)were the promoting factors of male students’AIDS prevention and control negotiation skills.Male students who did not smoke(OR=0.67,95%CI:0.49~0.92)had lower negotiation skills of AIDS prevention and control than smokers.No entertainment places visit experience(OR=1.33,95%CI:1.02~1.74).good objective support(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.01~1.11),good subjective support(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.02-1.10)and high support utilization(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.11~1.28)were the promoting factors of male normal students’refusal skills of AIDS prev
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...