司法解释中明知推定的双重体系位置  

The Dual System Position of Knowing Presumption in Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：程晓飞[1] CHENG Xiao-fei

机构地区：[1]青岛黄海学院,山东青岛266427

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2020年第5期14-24,共11页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地;四川省高校人文社会科学重点研究基社会治理创新研究中心一般项目“经济犯罪的刑事立法模式研究”(SHZLYB19001)。

摘　　要：犯罪故意的规范构造由“认识”与“意欲”两部分内容构成,已成通说。但是,故意的体系位置,却存在巨大的争议:因犯罪论体系的不同而具有不同的体系位置,即使采取同一犯罪论体系,故意的体系位置也存在巨大的争议。明知型犯罪作为直接故意犯罪的一种类型,在违法性判定中,排除了错误理论的适用空间,是一种一致的主客观对应关系之犯罪类型;在罪责的判断中,提高了罪责的程度,等同于“意图”犯罪中高度的法敌对态度。基于此,在明知型犯罪的认定过程中,如果行为人对行为对象不具有高于一般人的认知,则否定行为人的行为具有违法性,若行为人对行为对象没有意图的犯罪的中“高度的法敌对态度”,则行为人对其行为不具有罪责。It is widely recognized that the normative structure of criminal intent is composed of knowledge and inten⁃tion.However,there is a huge controversy about the system position of intention because the position is different in different criminal theory systems.The controversy exists even in the same criminal theory system.Knowing crime is a type of direct and intentional crime.In the determination of its illegality,the application space of wrong theory is excluded,and it is a type of crime with a consistent subjective and objective correspondence.In the judgment of guilt,the degree of guilt is in⁃creased,equivalent to a high degree of legal hostility in the intention crime.Therefore,in the process of identifying a know⁃ing crime,the perpetrator’s behavior is denied as illegal if the perpetrator does not have behavior subject awareness higher than average person.And the perpetrator is not responsible for his actions if the perpetrator does not hold a high degree of le⁃gal hostility to the behavior subject.

关 键 词：认识 意欲 违法 罪责 明知 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]