检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琳清 ZHANG Lin-qing
出 处:《四川警察学院学报》2020年第5期38-46,共9页Journal of Sichuan Police College
摘 要:关于情节加重犯的未遂问题应该如何处理,实践中一直存在着较大争议。理论上,存在着传统说与区分说之争,传统说认为情节加重犯均无例外地存在未遂情形,均适用未遂犯的规定进行处罚,区分说则是将之分为量刑规则与加重构成,认为只有加重构成的情形才存在未遂形态。但是两种学说在实践中均存在无法解释的问题,在提倡区分说的主流下,罪量加重构成概念对相关问题进行了精细化的划分,更有利于弥补以上学说的缺陷。How to deal with the attempted crime of aggravated offense by circumstances has been a controversial issue in practice.There is a dispute between the traditional theory and the differentiation theory.The traditional theory holds that there are all attempted circumstances without exception,and the provisions of attempted crime are applicable to punish⁃ment.The differentiation theory divides them into sentencing rules and aggravating constitution,only the aggravated consti⁃tution existing the unaccomplished form.However,both theories have some problems that can not be explained in practice.Based on the differentiation theory,it is suggested to make a fine division of the relevant issues in the concept of crime amount aggravation,which is helpful to making up for the defects of the above theories.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49