MV技术与超声造影对甲状腺结节诊断价值的对比研究  

A Comparative Study of the Value of MV and CEUS in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

作　　者：张馨丹[1] 刘佳[1] 李英梅[1] 岳庆雄[1] 周瑜[1] 姜美[1] ZHANG Xin-dan;LIU Jia;LI Ying-mei;YUE Qing-xiong;ZHOU Yu;JIANG Mei(Ultrasound Diagnosis Department of Dalian Central Hospital,Liaoning Dalian 116033)

机构地区：[1]大连市中心医院超声诊断科,辽宁大连116033

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2020年第20期153-155,共3页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:探讨MV技术与超声造影对甲状腺结节的诊断价值。方法:对本院2019年1月~2019年7月收治的78例甲状腺结节患者术前分别应用MV技术及超声造影技术评估甲状腺结节良恶性,以术后病理结果作为诊断金标准,分别判断其对甲状腺结节诊断的准确率、灵敏度、特异度。结果:甲状腺结节患者78例,共112个甲状腺结节,经术后病理证实良性甲状腺结节36个,恶性甲状腺结节76个。准确率:MV 85.71%;CEUS 91.96%,常规超声75.00%;灵敏度:MV 89.47%;CEUS 96.05%,常规超声78.94%;特异度:MV 77.78%;CEUS 83.33%,常规超声66.67%。结论:在甲状腺结节诊断准确率、灵敏度、特异度上,MV技术与超声造影技术均优于常规超声检查技术,但MV技术较CEUS尚有差距。Objective:To investigate the value of MV and CEUS in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Methods:78 patients with thyroid nodules admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to July 2019 were preoperatively assessed by MV technology and contrast-enhanced ultrasound technology to assess benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Postoperative pathological results were used as the diagnostic gold standard,respectively judge the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Results:There were 112 thyroid nodules in 78 patients,36 were benign and 76 were malignant.Accuracy:MV 85.71%;CEUS 91.96%;ultrasound 75.00%.Sensitivity:MV 89.47%;CEUS 96.05%;ultrasound 78.94%.Specificity:MV 77.78%;CEUS 83.33%;ultrasound 66.67%.Conclusion:In the accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of thyroid nodule diagnosis,MV technology and CEUS are superior to conventional ultrasound technology(P<0.05),but there is still a gap between MV and CEUS.

关 键 词：MV技术 超声造影 甲状腺结节 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]