“先私后售”行为的实务处断与裁判规则  

The Practical Convictions and Adjudication Rules of“Selling Before Smuggling”

作　　者：程衍 Cheng Yan(School of Science of East China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学科学研究院

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2020年第5期100-113,共14页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：我国刑法对于走私犯罪的立罪模式采"截短型"结构,以形式的法律属性作为行为立罪的原则,由此使得走私犯罪在大多数情况下成为"必然的"数罪类型。囿于司法适用中对这一立罪原则的认识不足,导致走私行为与后续销售行为在罪数处置判断上混乱。我国刑法未采用大陆法系国家对部分罪数类型与处断原则法定化的方式,而仅在分则中对同种罪数类型设定出不同的处断原则,现实地造成了理论与立法关系的错位。"先私后售"行为的罪数判断,必须建构明确的理论解决方案,区分确定性目的走私与非确定性目的走私,将罪数理论基本原理引入走私行为的分析之中,确定行为本质的差异,明确罪数判定一般原则,通过立法完善之路径,将走私犯罪罪数认定原则法定化。The criminal law of our country adopts the structure of"truncation type",that is,taking the legal attribute of form as the principle of behavior crime.This makes the smuggling crime inevitably become a combined crime in most cases.Due to the lack of understanding of this principle in judicial application,the judgment of the number of crimes for smuggling and subsequent sales is confusing.The civil law countries legalize certain types of crimes and punishment principles.China’s criminal law does not adopt the way like what civil law countries do,and only sets different principles of punishment for the same types of crimes in the specific provisions,resulting in the dislocation of the relationship between theory and legislation.In order to judge the number of crimes of"selling before smuggling",we must build a clear theoretical solution,distinguish between the definite purpose smuggling and the non-definite purpose smuggling,introduce the basic principle of the number of crimes theory into the analysis of smuggling behavior,determine the essential difference of behavior,define the general principle of the number of crimes,and legalize the principle of the number of crimes of smuggling through the path of legislative perfection.

关 键 词：走私犯罪 立罪模式 罪数理论 判断原则 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]