越南史学家语言规范思想及其实质--以黎文休、吴士连《大越史记全书》李朝、陈朝史评为例  

The Thoughts of Vietnamese Historians’Language Specification and Its Essence:Based on Historical Review of Li and Chen Dynasty in The History of Vietnam

作　　者：禹平[1,2] 肖可意 YU Ping;XIAO Ke-yi

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,长春130012 [2]吉林大学图书馆,长春130012 [3]吉林外国语大学文学院,长春130117

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2020年第6期206-213,236,共9页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(14BZS123)。

摘　　要：古代越南史学家均由儒臣担任,他们一般都具有较高的史学及文学造诣。越南史学家在编纂史书时,除了记载史事之外,还常在某些史事之后,以"某某曰""史臣某某曰"对史事进行点评,其中一些史评反映了当时越南史学家以儒家思想为背景的语言规范思想,而这一思想往往通过对"正名"如皇帝、大臣称谓、言语行为是否得体等的史评表现出来。《大越史记全书》的编纂者黎文休、吴士连等在李朝、陈朝史事后的部分评论,实质上反映了他们对儒家文化和礼制的认同与推崇,揭示了儒家文化和价值观在古代越南思想和社会领域的真实地位及传播情况。The positions of ancient Vietnamese historians were all taken by Confucian officials,and they generally had high history and literary attainments.When compiling historical books,Vietnamese historians often commented on certain historical events,in addition to recording historical events.Some historical reviews reflect the time.Vietnamese historians use Confucianism as the background of language specification,and this idea is often expressed in historical reviews by formal appellation such as emperor,ministerial title,or appropriateness of speech.Li Wen-xiu and Wu Shilian’s historical review of Li Dynasty and Chen Dynasty selected from The History of Vietnamy which was edited by them,in fact reflecting their recognition and admiration of Confucian culture and ritual system,and revealing the Confucian cultural values and the true status and spreading ancient Vietnamese thought and society.

关 键 词：越南史学家 《大越史记全书》 史事点评 儒家文化 黎文休 吴士连 

分 类 号：K333[历史地理—历史学]