京津冀产业协同发展:多重困境与韧性应对  

Industrial Collaboration Development of Beijing Tianjin Hebei:Multiple Dilemmas and Resilient Actions

作　　者：赵霄伟[1] Zhao Xiaowei

机构地区：[1]国家信息中心,北京100045

出　　处：《区域经济评论》2020年第6期71-79,共9页Regional Economic Review

摘　　要：借鉴韧性理论的急性冲击和慢性压力的分析框架,分析京津冀产业协同发展面临的风险与挑战是解决京津冀产业协同问题的基础和前提。经研究发现,中美贸易摩擦、新冠肺炎疫情等加剧了京津冀产业链不强、创新链不牢、供应链不稳的风险,进而增加了产业协同的不确定性;产业疏解“转移”与“承接”、产业布局“过密”与“过疏”、产业链条“主链”与“次链”等多重矛盾与冲突加剧了产业协同的不稳定性。因此要研究制定“韧性+”应对策略,把韧性理念融入到产业协同发展的各个环节;积极推进“三步走”和“三协同”的应对战略,从而解决产业协同的“急性病”和“慢性病”的问题。It is the basis and premise to solve the problem of industrial collaboration in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei,that analyzing the risks and challenges faced by the industrial collaborative development of Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei,and based on the analysis framework of acute impact and chronic pressure of resilience theory.The study found that the trade frictions between China and US and the novel coronavirus pneumonia,exacerbated the risk of Beijing Tianjin Hebei industrial chain is not strong,innovation chain is not stable,supply chain is instability,and thus increases the uncertainty of Industrial Synergy;The industrial ease“transfer”and“undertake”,industrial layout“too dense”and“too sparse”,industrial chain“main chain”and“sub chain”and other contradictions and conflicts intensified the industry collaboration instability.Therefore,it is necessary to study and formulate“resilience+”coping strategies,integrate resilience theory into all aspects of industrial coordinated development,and actively promote the“three-step”and“three synergy”coping strategies,so as to solve the“acute disease”and“chronic disease”problems of industrial synergy.

关 键 词：京津冀 产业协同 多重困境 韧性应对 

分 类 号：F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]