《民法典》中连带债务抗辩权的解释论研究  

A Study of the Interpretative Theory of the Right of Defense of Solidary Obligation in the Civil Code

作　　者：傅强[1] FU Qiang(School of Law, Northwest University,Xi’an 710127, China)

机构地区：[1]西北大学法学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第6期58-64,共7页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“民法典中性别平等机制的建构研究”(18BFX188)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《民法典》就连带债务人抗辩权的规定需要通过体系解释加以限缩。《民法典》对连带债务人抗辩未加限制的规定与连带债务免除的限制绝对效力规定存在利益失衡的风险。《民法典》未明确规定的其他连带债务人对债权人抗辩的范围、时效和效力等事项都需要通过对民法典连带之债规定的理论基础分析后才能获得解释。The provisions of the Civil Code concerning the right of defense of the solidary debtor need to be restricted through systemic interpretation.There are risks of interest imbalance as to the non-restrictive provisions of the Civil Code on solidary debtors’defenses and the restrictive absolute effect of the exemption of solidary debts.The scope of other debtors’defenses against the creditors and the effectiveness of the statute of limitations defenses,which are not clearly stipulated in the Civil Code,could only be explained on the theoretical analysis of the provisions of the solidary debt of the Civil Code.

关 键 词：中华人民共和国民法典 连带债务 追偿 抗辩 限制绝对效力 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]