契丹伐晋起因再探——兼论后晋出帝朝的政治转向  

A Re-study on the Causes of the Khitan-Later Jin War——With a Discussion on the Political Turn of Later Jin Dynasty

作　　者：吴翔宇[1] WU Xiang-yu(School of the Humanities,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第6期80-91,共12页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：北族王朝史书《辽史》和以后晋实录为基础的中原王朝史书,对契丹伐晋起因的记载有较大差异,二者皆将战争的爆发归咎于对方。学界多认为石重贵去臣称孙及此后的一系列挑衅导致了契丹南侵,与契丹方观点暗合,然而后晋的记载似应更接近历史本相,即后晋平卢节度使杨光远叛晋通敌之举招致了契丹南侵,这在双方首次交战的军事部署中也可以得到有力佐证。后晋出帝朝的政治转向是促使辽太宗伐晋的深层原因,杨光远的作用在这一背景下亦有所体现。There are significant differences in recording the causes of the Khitan-Later Jin War between The History of Liao produced by the Northern Dynasty and the historical books in the Central Plains Dynasty based on the veritable records of Later Jin,in which the two countries blamed each other for the outbreak of the war.Researchers generally believe that Shi Chonggui’s denial for Later Jin as a vassal state of Khitan and the subsequent provocations led to Khitan’s invasion,which is in line with Khitan’s view.However,the former’s view(the history records by Later Jin Dynasty)should be closer to the truth that the military governor of Pinglu Yang Guangyuan’s betrayal resulted in Khitan’s invasion,which could also be corroborated by the military deployment in the first engagement between the two sides.However,Shi Chonggui’s political turn,in which Yang Guangyuan also played a role,was in fact the underlying cause of Khitan’s invasion.

关 键 词：契丹 后晋 契丹伐晋 杨光远 政治转向 

分 类 号：K243.1[历史地理—历史学]