检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王加勇[1] 陆紫敏[1] 方琦[1] WANG Jiayong;LU Zimin;FANG Qi(Department of Blood Transfusion,the Affiliated Tong Ji Hospital of Tong Ji University,Shanghai 200065,China)
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属同济医院临床输血科,上海200065
出 处:《中国输血杂志》2020年第7期715-717,共3页Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
摘 要:目的探讨PDCA循环法在临床输血权限管理持续改进中的应用及实施效果。方法收集本院2018年6—10月500例临床输血申请单,分析临床输血权限管理不合格的原因,并于2018年11月—2019年4月应用PDCA循环管理,对比实施前后临床输血权限审核率的差异。结果应用PDCA循环,临床输血权限审核率由干预前的96.2%提高至98.6%(P<0.05)。结论实施PDCA循环进行临床输血权限管理,有利于规范临床输血流程,保证患者临床输血安全。Objective To evaluate the effect of PDCA Cycle on management in physicians′privilege of blood use.Methods A total of 500 clinical transfusion request forms were collected from June to October 2018 in our hospital,to analyze the causes of inappropriate practice in clinical blood requesting regarding to respective privilege.The PDCA cycle management was applied from November 2018 to April 2019,and the difference of pass rates of physicians′blood requesting before and after the implementation of continuous quality improvement(CQI)was compared.Results After the implementation of PDCA cycle,the pass rate of physicians′blood requesting increased to 98.6%,which was significantly higher than that before intervention(96.2%)(P<0.05).Conclusion The implementation of PDCA cycle management on physicians′privilege of blood use is conducive to standardize the clinical blood transfusion process and deliver safe transfusion for patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.37.74