网络不作为参与行为不法类型的重塑  

Reshaping Types of Physical Illegality of the Cyber-related Omission as Criminal Participation

作　　者：敬力嘉 Jing Lijia

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《政治与法律》2020年第11期38-51,共14页Political Science and Law

基　　金：2017年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“提高反恐怖主义情报信息工作能力对策研究”(项目编号:17JZD034);2019年中国法学会部级研究课题青年调研项目[项目编号:CLS(2019)Y04];中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(项目编号:2020A1015)的成果。

摘　　要：在传统犯罪迅速网络化的当下,不作为与作为犯罪参与,以及不作为犯罪参与和日常不可罚行为的界限都日趋模糊,需要在层次化的归责判断中,明确其行为不法类型。通过厘定不作为犯罪参与的评价对象为行为人意图控制下的容许行为,判断标准为具体构成要件中的作为义务违反,归责结果为举止规范层面统一评价、制裁规范层面区别处遇的“类单一正犯”不法结构,可以实现对网络不作为参与行为不法类型的重塑,明确刑法的处罚标准。With the rapid internetization of traditional crimes,the boundaries between the omission-mode and the action-mode participations in a crime,the omission-mode participation in a crime and non-punishable daily behavior,are becoming more and more blurred.It is necessary to clarify types of the physical illegality of those acts during the hierarchical imputation.The types of the physical illegality of cyber-related omission as a criminal participation may be reshaped to clarify the punishing standards of criminal law by making clear that the evaluation object of the omission-mode participation in a crime is the behavior permitted and controlled by the actor’s intention,the judgment standard is whether the duty to act within the context of the specific constituent elements of a crime is violated,and the result of the imputation is the illegal structure of"quasi unitary principal offender"that there are unified evaluation at the level of behavioral norms and differentiated treatments at the level of sanction norms.

关 键 词：网络不作为参与 层次化归责判断 容许行为 作为义务违反 类单一正犯 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]