检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李云鹏 LI Yunpeng(Shenyang 10th People's Hospital,Shenyang 110000,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第28期83-84,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨经支气管镜注射药物联合雾化吸入治疗支气管结核患者的效果。方法 70例支气管结核患者均于沈阳市第十人民医院接受治疗,时间为2018年1月至2020年1月,将其平均分为对照组和观察组,每组35例。对照组实施常规抗结核治疗,观察组实施经支气管镜注射药物联合雾化吸入治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果和不良反应发生情况。结果观察组的治疗有效率为97.14%,明显高于对照组的74.29%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率为2.86%,明显低于对照组的22.86%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论经支气管镜注射药物联合雾化吸入治疗支气管结核患者的整体效果较好,且不良反应较少。Objective To investigate the effect of bronchoscope injection of drugs combined with nebulization inhalation in the treatment of patients with bronchial tuberculosis.Methods From January 2018 to January 2020,70 cases of bronchial tuberculosis patients in our hospital were selected as the object of this study,and they were evenly divided into control group and observation group,with 35 cases in each group.The control group was treated with routine antituberculosis therapy,and the observation group was treated with bronchoscopy injection of drugs combined with atomization therapy,and the therapeutic effect and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed and compared.Results The effective rate of the observation group was 97.14%,which was significantly higher than that of the 74.29%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 2.86%,which was significantly lower than that of the 22.86%in the control group,and the difference was statistically signifi cant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of bronchial tuberculosis,the combination of drugs injected through bronchoscope and atomization can improve the treatment effect,with less adverse reactions and better overall effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117