检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈威 CHEN Wei(Xinmin People's Hospital of Shenyang,Shenyang 110300,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第28期185-186,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的观察腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术围手术期的快速康复护理效果。方法 66例腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术患者均于新民市医院接受治疗,时间为2018年2月至2019年2月,按照围手术期是否行快速康复护理将所有患者分为对照组(33例,未行快速康复护理)与试验组(33例,行快速康复护理),比较两组患者干预效果。结果试验组患者术后首次排气时间、术后首次排便时间以及平均住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组患者住院期间不良反应发生率(6.06%)明显低于对照组(18.18%)(P <0.05)。结论腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术患者围手术期快速康复护理干预效果明显优于常规护理干预效果。Objective To observe the effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing in perioperative period of laparoscopic repair of gastric perforation.Methods All 66 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric perforation repair were treated in Xinmin City Hospital from February 2018 to February 2019.All patients were divided i nto control groups(33 cases,no rapid rehabilitation nursing)and the experimental group(33 cases,rapid rehabilitation nursing),to compare the intervention effects of the two groups of patients.Results The first exhaust time,the fi rst defecation time and the average hospital stay in the experimental group were less than those in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions during hospitalization in the experimental group(6.06%)was signifi cantly lower than that in the control group(18.18%),P<0.05.Conclusion The eff ect of nursing intervention for perioperative rapid rehabilitation of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric perforation repair is obviously better than that of routine nursing intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200