明末清初遗民士人对屈原精神的诠释——以王夫之、钱澄之、屈大均为例  

Interpretations of Qu Yuan Spirit by the Adherent Scholars During the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties:A Case Study on Wang Fuzhi,Qian Chengzhi and Qu Dajun

作　　者：葛亚杰 GE Yajie(Basic Courses Teaching Department,Shandong Foreign Trade Vocational College,Qingdao Shandong 266100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东外贸职业学院基础教学部,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期98-105,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：在明清易代的背景下,屈原精神被赋予了新的意义。遗民士人面对天崩地坼的社会大变局,纷纷举起了屈原精神的大旗,其中尤以王夫之、钱澄之、屈大均为最力。三人的经历各不相同,因而对屈原精神的阐释也具有不同的特点。王夫之探讨了君臣关系和屈原精神的实际作用两个经典论题;钱澄之秉承“庄屈无二论”,理顺了庄屈连通的内在逻辑;屈大均作为屈原的后人,在“诗”“骚”关系、君臣关系、庄屈关系上提出了新的见解。三人不约而同地在儒家话语体系内评价屈原,其实质是对复归儒家伦理价值观的呼唤。Under the background of the dynasty alternation from Ming to Qing,the spirit of Qu Yuan was endowed with new meaning.Confronting the great change of society,the adherent scholars of Ming dynasty raised Qu Yuan spirit,and Wang Fuzhi,Qian Chengzhi,and Qu Dajun made the best efforts during this process.Their interpretations of Qu Yuan Spirit had different features due to their different life experiences.Wang Fuzhi explored two classic themes,namely,the relationship between the Emperor and ministers and the actual effect of Qu Yuan spirit.Qian Chengzhi considered that there is theoretical consistency between Zhuang Zi and Qu Yuan,and he rationalized the internal logic of connectivity between Zhuangzi and Qu Yuan.As the posterity of Qu Yuan,Qu Dajun put forward new views about the relationships between the Book of Songs and Chu Ci,the Emperor and ministers,Zhuangzi and Qu Yuan.The essence of these three scholars’unanimous comments on Qu Yuan in the Confucian discourse system is the call for returning to Confucian ethical values.

关 键 词：明末清初 遗民士人 屈原精神 儒家价值观 庄屈无二论 孟屈关系 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]