检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晓勤[1] Chen Xiaoqin
机构地区:[1]福建行政学院法学教研部,福建福州372001
出 处:《法学杂志》2020年第11期91-101,129,共12页Law Science Magazine
基 金:福建省社科规划项目“福建省政府数据开放法律保障制度研究”(项目编号:FJ2018C003);福建省委党校2018年科研重点课题“政府数据开放法律保障制度研究”(项目编号:2018A03)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:当前政府和社会的大数据立法需求主要包括完善管理体制、畅通汇聚共享环节、明晰数据权属、明确数据开放开发规则、加强数据安全监管、完善产业促进措施六大方面。现有地方立法核心概念不一,导致制度存在地方差异,同时在治理理念和具体内容上存在不足,远远滞后于数据治理和数据经济发展的迅猛之势。大数据地方立法应当回应政府数据治理和企业发展的实践需求,以数据资源高效利用为导向,明晰数据治理主体和责任,建立汇聚共享、开放开发、安全监管等数据资源利用的制度框架,梳理促进和保障大数据发展的主要调整手段并予以规范。At present,demand from the government and society for legislation on big data mainly includes improving the management system of data,facilitating the pooling and sharing,clarifying ownership,specifying regulations on the opening up and development,strengthening data security supervision and improving measures of industrial development.The inconsistency of the core concept of the existing local legislation leads to local differences in the system.Meanwhile,the deficiency in governance philosophy and specific content makes it lag far behind the rapid development of data governance and the data economy.Local legislation should respond to the demand for data governance from governments and need for development from enterprises.Oriented to an efficient utilization of data resources,the legislation should clarify the governance entity of big data and its responsibilities,build an institutional framework in respect of data pooling,sharing,opening up and developing as well as security in the utilization of data resources,and find out major adjusting measures to promote and guarantee the development of big data and make relevant regulations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145