三种监测方法对登革热媒介白纹伊蚊的诱捕效果研究  

STUDY ON THE CAPTURE EFFECT OF THREE MONITORING METHODS ON DENGUE FEVER VECTOR AEDES

作　　者：朱丁[1] 兰策介[1] 邹亚明[1] 刘蕴华[1] 王荷生[1] 焦建栋[1] ZHU Ding;LAN Ce-Jie;ZOU Ya-Ming;LIU Yun-Hua;WANG He-Sheng;JIAO Jian-Dong(Wuxi Centre for Disease Control and Prevention,Wuxi 214023,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]无锡市疾病预防控制中心,江苏无锡214023

出　　处：《寄生虫与医学昆虫学报》2020年第3期164-167,共4页Acta Parasitologica et Medica Entomologica Sinica

基　　金：无锡市“双百”中青年医疗卫生拔尖人才培养计划。

摘　　要：2019年9月在无锡市一大型居民区内选择3个生境不同的点位,分别用人诱停落法、双层叠帐法、BG-trap诱捕法3种方法,根据3×3拉丁方实验设计调查伊蚊成蚊密度。结果显示,不同监测时间点和不同生境捕获白纹伊蚊雌蚊总数差异不显著;人诱停落法与双层叠帐法之间亦无显著差异,但两者均显著高于BG-trap,且三者间无显著相关性。因此,人诱停落法和双层叠帐法较BG-trap诱捕法更加灵敏,更适合伊蚊媒疾病流行期间的快速监测。The female Ae.albopictus density was monitored in a large residential area of Wuxi city in Sep.2019 with human trapping,double fold curtain and BG-trap methods based on 3×3 Latin square design.No significant difference was observed in the total number of Aedes mosquitoes trapped at different time points(P=0.718)and habitats(P=0.921).There was also no significant difference observed between human landing counts and the double curtains net method(P=1.000),which both appeared more effective and sensitive than BG-trap method.Therefore,human landing counts and the double curtains net method were more suitable for rapid monitoring during the epidemic period.

关 键 词：伊蚊 人诱停落法 双层叠帐法 BG-trap 

分 类 号：R384.1[医药卫生—医学寄生虫学]