检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓艳华[1] DENG Yan-hua(Department of Urology and Thoracic surgery,Panzhihua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Panzhihua 617000,China)
机构地区:[1]四川省攀枝花市中西医结合医院胸外科,四川攀枝花617000
出 处:《实用医院临床杂志》2020年第6期187-189,共3页Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨食管癌根治术患者强化康复护理计划对患者康复效果的影响。方法2018年3月至2019年3月在我院行食管癌根治术患者80例,按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组各40例。对照组给予常规护理,试验组给予强化康复护理,比较两组患者术后住院时间、30天死亡率、术后并发症发生率及术后30天再入院率。结果试验组住院时间短于对照组(P<0.001),并发症发生率、30天死亡率及30天再入院率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对食管癌手术患者实施强化康复护理计划有助于加速患者康复,缩短住院时间,且不增加患者术后并发症、死亡率及30天再入院率。Objective To compare the postoperative outcomes of enhanced recovery program(ERP)with conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy.Methods From March 2018 to March 2019,eighty patients with pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer in our hospital were enrolled and divided into control and experimental group,40 in each group.The control group was given conventional care,while the experimental group was given ERP.The outcomes of interest included postoperative length of hospital stay(LOHS),incidence of complication,mortality and 30-day readmission rates were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group,the total LOHS in the experimental group was significantly shorter(P<0.001).There were no statistically differences in the incidence of complication,mortality or 30-day readmission rates.Conclusion Compared with conventional care,ERP can reduce LOHS in patients with esophagectomy and it does not influence the incidence of complication,mortality and 30-day readmission rates.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104