检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾承静[1] 王玉刚[1] GU Cheng-jing;WANG Yu-gang(Taizhou People's Hospital,Taizhou 225300,China)
出 处:《中国处方药》2020年第11期49-51,共3页Journal of China Prescription Drug
摘 要:目的通过审方药师对PIVAS不合理医嘱的干预,保证患者静脉用药安全性和合理性。方法对2019年12月PIVAS不合理医嘱进行归纳统计并分析。结果审方药师成功干预PIVAS不合理医嘱共142条,主要类型为单次给药剂量错误、配伍浓度错误、给药频次错误、溶媒选择错误、给药途径错误、用药禁忌。结论审方药师有效干预PIVAS不合理医嘱使静脉用药更加合理规范,临床治疗水平有所提高。Objective To ensure the safety and rationality of intravenous drug use through the intervention of prescription pharmacists on unreasonable orders of PIVAS in our hospital.Methods The unreasonable orders of PIVAS in December 2019 were analyzed.Results There were 142 unreasonable orders of PIVAS successfully intervened by the pharmacists.The main types were wrong dosage,wrong concentration,wrong frequency of administration,wrong choice of solvent,wrong route of administration and contraindications.Conclusion The effective intervention of prescription pharmacists on unreasonable orders of PIVAS makes the intravenous medication more reasonable and standardized in our hospital,and the clinical treatment level has been improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28