基于博弈论组合赋权的电力设备供应商模糊综合评价  

Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of power equipment suppliers based on game theory and combination weighting

作　　者：门业堃 钱梦迪 于钊 滕景竹 陈少坤 李晓菲 MEN Yekun;QIAN Mengdi;YU Zhao;TENG Jingzhu;CHEN Shaokun;LI Xiaofei(State Grid Beijing Electric Power Company Electric Power Research Institute,Beijing 100075,China;Beijing Ibdpower Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]国网北京市电力公司电力科学研究院,北京100075 [2]北京恒华龙信数据科技有限公司,北京100088

出　　处：《电力系统保护与控制》2020年第21期179-186,共8页Power System Protection and Control

基　　金：国家电网公司科技项目资助(52022318001H)。

摘　　要：针对国家电网电力设备供应商在综合评价方面的不足,设计了一种基于博弈论组合赋权的模糊综合评价模型。首先,该模型构建了包含设备台账、设备缺陷和设备装用范围等特征的评价体系,利用层次分析法和因子分析法分别计算各评价指标的主观权重和客观权重,然后利用博弈论集合的思想对两种权重进行组合赋权,最后根据最大隶属度原则确定供应商类别,完成最终评价。以国网公司2004年—2018年投运162个电力设备供应商为例,结果显示,共有A类供应商30个,B类供应商16个,C类供应商116个。验证了评价模型的客观合理性,可为电网公司针对电力设备供应商的管理决策提供参考价值。There are shortcomings in the comprehensive evaluation of the national grid power equipment suppliers.To tackle this,a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on game theory combined weighting is designed.First,the model constructs an evaluation system including features such as equipment ledger,equipment defects and equipment installation scope,and uses the analytic hierarchy process and factor analysis method to calculate the subjective weight and objective weight of each evaluation index.Then,the idea of the game theory set is used to combine and weight the two weights.Finally,the supplier category is determined according to the principle of maximum membership,and the final evaluation is completed.Taking the example of 162 power equipment suppliers put into operation by the State Grid Corporation from 2004 to 2018,the results show that there are 30 A-type suppliers,16 B-type suppliers and 116 C-type suppliers.The objective rationality of the evaluation model is verified,and this can provide reference value for the grid company to make management decisions for power equipment suppliers.

关 键 词：电力设备供应商 层次分析法 因子分析法 博弈论组合赋权 模糊综合评价 

分 类 号：F426.61[经济管理—产业经济] F274