检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鹏[1,2] LIU Peng(Law school,Business College of Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030031,China;Institute of Human Rights,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]山西大学商务学院法学院,山西太原030031 [2]西南政法大学人权研究院,重庆401120
出 处:《浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期281-287,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(18BFX068);山西省法学会课题(SXLSB19)。
摘 要:信息安全领域的区块链技术创生的新治理空间需要规范回应。该领域存在的账户资产私密和密钥安全保管风险、共识机制主体平等与技术失衡、区块链技术的系统性与稳定性困境,其核心源于信用机制问题。在法哲学命题中,分析区块链系统中技术效率与平等问题、区块链治理中的公域与私域边界反思、区块链规范中的监管与自律悖论及消解,可知,应确立实现技术伦理规范共识、技术标准生成、治理规范建构的三元治理路径,服务于网络互信体系的重置及智慧法治的建设。New governance space created by blockchain technology in the field of information security needs normative response.The core of problem lies in credit mechanism,such as risks of account asset privacy and key safe keeping,subject equality and technology imbalance of consensus mechanism,and systematic and stable dilemma of blockchain technology.This paper intends to return to its legal philosophy proposition,analyze technical efficiency and equality in blockchain system,rethink the boundary between public domain and private domain in blockchain governance,resolve the paradox and resolution of supervision and self-discipline in blockchain specification,so as to realize the tripartite governance path of consensus of technical ethics norms,generation of technical standards and construction of governance norms,so as to serve the reset of network mutual trust system and the construction of intelligent rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222