中国的比较行政法研究:回顾与展望  

China’s Comparative Administrative Law Research:Retrospect and Prospect

作　　者：宋华琳[1] Song Hualin

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《中国社会科学评价》2020年第3期76-90,159,共16页China Social Science Review

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“创新发展中国特色社会主义法治理论体系研究”(17@ZH014)的成果。

摘　　要：比较行政法的研究中,观察不同国家行政法理论与制度的演进,就各国行政法律的规范结构、行政法解释、行政审判的不同技术、行政管理方式和实效进行比较,有助于反思我国行政法学理论的利弊得失,使学说更趋精良,并有助于反思我国的法律继受,改进我国的行政审判质量。在这个意义上,比较行政法应选取更为翔实可靠的研究资料。在既往的研究中,我国相对更关注西方法治发达国家的行政法,但比较行政法目的还在于,加深对不同政治体制和经济、社会、文化背景下行政法治的理解,并吸取一些国家行政法治发展的教训,因此,应拓宽比较行政法研究的视界,开展行政法结构改革、政府规制、行政过程、全球行政、风险规制以及学说史等比较研究。In studying comparative administrative law,observation of the evolution of theories and systems of administrative law in different countries and the comparison of their normative structures,interpretations of administrative law,techniques in administrative trials,methods of administrative management and actual effects can help us reflect on the pros and cons of Chinese administrative law theory and thus refine it.They also help us reflect on Chinese adopted law and improve the quality of administrative trials.In this sense,we should select more detailed and reliable research materials in comparative administrative law.Our previous research has paid more attention to Western countries with a well-developed rule of law.However,another objective of comparative administrative law is deepening our understanding of the administrative rule of law under different political systems and economic,social and cultural backgrounds,and drawing lessons from their development.Therefore,we should broaden our horizons and carry out comparative research on the structural reform of administrative law,governmental regulations,administrative processes,global administration,risk regulation,the history of different theories,etc.

关 键 词：比较行政法 比较法 学说史 制度史 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]