检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张春昌 帅月新 HUANG Rui ZHANG Chunchang;SHUAI Yuexin(Merchant Marine College,Shanghai Maritime University;China Ship Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Settlement Centre)
机构地区:[1]上海海事大学商船学院 [2]中国船舶油污损害理赔事务中心理赔审核部 [3]不详
出 处:《中华海洋法学评论》2020年第3期83-118,共36页China Oceans Law Review
摘 要:2019年9月,最高人民法院公布对“达飞佛罗里达”轮与“舟山”轮碰撞污染事故应急处置费用纠纷案的再审判决,引发业界高度关注和广泛讨论。本文结合国际公约、国际惯例和国内法律,对判决书中所涉及的非漏油船的责任承担、海难救助和污染应急之界定、政府部门对应急处置费用的民事索赔权利等法律焦点问题,进行详细剖析并作出相应评论意见和建议,以期为海事行政执法机关、海事司法审判机构等海商界处理类似事故和案件提供适当的参照。The Supreme People’s Court announced the retrial decision on the dispute over the cost of preventive measures in the collision and pollution accident of M.V CMA CGM Florida and M.V Chou Shan in September 2019,which has called highly attention and widely discussion in society.Taking into account international conventions,international practice and relevant domestic laws,this paper provides a detailed analysis on the legal focal points of the Judgment,such as the liability of non-spilled vessel,the definition of salvage operations and pollution response,and the government’s civil right to claim for the cost of emergency disposals.It also makes corresponding comments and suggestions which aim to provide appropriate guidance for maritime business community,such as maritime safety administrative agencies and maritime judicial trial bodies in dealing with similar incidents and cases.
分 类 号:D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.252.84