安钢2#高炉配套轴流压缩机两种驱动方式的能源消耗对比分析  

ENERGY CONSUMPTION COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO DRIVING MODES OF AXIAL COMPRESSOR FOR 2#BLAST FURNACE IN ANYANG STEEL

作　　者：马理军[1] 郭宏栋[2] 王伟明[2] 王庆丰[2] 陈永峰[2] Ma Lijun;Guo Hongdong;Wang Weiming;Wang Qingfeng;Chen Yongfeng(Anyang Iron and Steel Stock Co.,Ltd)

机构地区：[1]安阳钢铁股份有限公司动力厂,河南安阳455004 [2]安阳钢铁股份有限公司,河南安阳455004

出　　处：《河南冶金》2020年第5期36-38,共3页Henan Metallurgy

摘　　要：通过对轴流压缩机的机械效率,汽轮机内效率、锅炉效率、辅机用电率、压缩机E点功率,高炉煤气热值等数据的计算,得出了安钢2#高炉配套压缩机两种驱动模式下能源消耗的总数,并进行了经济效益的比对分析,为现代大型高炉轴流压缩机组选用何种驱动方式提供了依据。Through the calculation of the mechanical efficiency of the axial compressor,the internal efficiency of turbine,the efficiency of boiler,the power consumption of auxiliary machine,the power of compressor E point,the calorific value of blast furnace gas and other data,the total amount of energy consumption under two driving modes of 2#blast furnace supporting compressor of Anyang Steel is obtained,and the comparative analysis of economic benefits is carried out,which provides the driving mode for modern large-scale blast furnace axial compressor unit the numerical basis is given.

关 键 词：动力工程及工程热物理 轴流压缩机 能源 

分 类 号：TF321[冶金工程—冶金机械及自动化]