我国最低工资标准制定中的“跟风行为”--基于2004~2017年省级面板数据的实证研究  

The Comparison Effect of Minimum Wage Adjustments in China: Based on the Provincial Panel Data from 2004 to 2017

作　　者：杨灿[1] 叶林祥[2] 詹鹏 Yang Can;Ye Linxiang;Zhan Peng(Beijing Normal University,Beijing;Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing;School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University,Zhejiang)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院 [2]南京财经大学 [3]浙江大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2020年第5期79-89,共11页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国家庭数据库建设及其应用研究”(项目编号:18ZDA080);国家社会科学基金项目“新时代我国农村贫困性质变化及2020年后反贫困政策研究”(项目编号:19ZDA116)。

摘　　要：文章利用2004~2017年我国31个省市面板数据分析发现,各省市在调整最低工资标准时,并没有充分考虑劳动者及其家庭的基本生活需要、当地经济发展程度等因素,而是受其他省市最低工资标准是否调整的影响,即存在"跟风行为"。这种"跟风"不是基于地理位置上的、向相邻地区的"跟风",而是基于经济发展水平上的、向发达地区的"跟风"。文章建议人力资源与社会保障部应该规范最低工资调整机制,对各省市最低工资标准的调整进行指导和评估,引导和监督各省市从本地区实际出发合理制定最低工资标准。建立健全事前统筹指导、事中三方协商和事后政策评估的调整机制,从机制上保证各地最低工资标准调整的规范性。Based on the provincial panel data from 2004 to 2017, this article finds that provinces pay more attention to the adjustment of other provinces than the basic living needs of workers and their families and the degree of local economic development when they adjust minimum wages. There is an act of following the trend. This kind of act is not based on geographic locations such as adjacent regions, but based on the higher economic development level. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security should standardize the minimum wage adjustment mechanism, guide and evaluate the adjustment of the minimum wage standards in various provinces, guide and supervise the minimum wage standard based on their actual conditions. It is necessary establish a sound adjustment mechanism for pre-planning overall guidance, tripartite consultations and post-event policy evaluations to ensure the normalization of the adjustment to minimum wages.

关 键 词：最低工资标准 面板数据 LOGIT模型 跟风行为 

分 类 号：F244.2[经济管理—劳动经济]