检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:华晓红[1] 王丽萍[1] 曲光娜 汤敏[1] 熊炜[1] 杨紫薇 HUA Xiao-hong;WANG Li-ping;QU Guan-gna;TANG min;XIONG Wei;YANG Zi-wei(Daqing Longnan Hospital/The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College,Daqing,HeiLongJiang,163453)
机构地区:[1]大庆龙南医院/齐齐哈尔医学院第五附属医院,黑龙江大庆163453
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2020年第69期6-7,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的解析普外科急性胃穿孔患者采用优质护理的临床价值。方法纳入我院2017年3月-2018年3月间的普外科急性胃穿孔患者,共64例,经计算机的筛选后分为对照和观察两组,均有32例,前一组接受常规护理干预,后一组实施优质护理干预,比对护理效果。结果不良发应发生率[观察组(6.25%)VS对照组(34.38%)],P<0.05;观察组胃肠恢复时间显著短于对照组,P<0.05。结论在普外科急性胃穿孔患者护理中,优质护理干预措施应用价值高,可加快患者的恢复,减少不良发应的发生,推荐推广。Objective to analyze the clinical value of high-quality nursing care for patients with acute gastric perforation in general surgery.Methods 64 patients with acute gastric perforation in general surgery were included in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2018.After screening by computer,they were divided into control group and observation group,with 32 cases in each group.The former group received routine nursing intervention,while the latter group implemented high-quality nursing intervention,and the nursing effect was compared.Results adverse reaction rate[observation group(6.25%)vs.control group(34.38%)],P<0.05.The gastrointestinal recovery time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion in the nursing of patients with acute gastric perforation in general surgery,the application value of high-quality nursing intervention measures is high,which can accelerate the recovery of patients and reduce the occurrence of adverse events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.31.200