论我国中止犯处罚原则中的“损害”  

“Damage”in Punishment Principle of Suspension of Crime in China

作　　者：董姝含 DONG Shu-han(School of Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《宜春学院学报》2020年第10期45-49,58,共6页Journal of Yichun University

摘　　要：我国刑法第24条第2款规定了中止犯的处罚原则:“对于中止犯,没有造成损害的,应当免除处罚;造成损害的,应当减轻处罚”,但对于“损害”二字的含义却始终没有明确,这给司法适用造成了一定的困扰,也在一定程度上影响了我国刑事司法的统一性。首先,中止前的行为已构成犯罪、“损害”非构成中止形态的犯罪的构成要件结果、“损害”与行为之间须存在因果关系、“损害”须能够主观归责是认定“损害”的四个前提。其次,危害行为侵犯直接客体所造成的且是刑法规范明文规定的危害结果是“损害”的基本内涵。最后,实行行为造成损害才是中止犯处罚原则中“损害”的产生原因。Article 24,paragraph 2,of the criminal law of our country prescribes the principle of punishment for the offense of suspension:“For the offense of suspension,if no harm has been caused,the penalty shall be exempted.If damage is caused,the punishment shall be mitigated.”However,the meaning of the word“damage”has not been clearly defined.This has caused some confusion to judicial application and affects the unity of criminal justice in China to a certain extent.First of all,there are four prerequisites for the determination of“damage”:the act before the suspension constitutes a crime;the“damage”is not the result of the constitutive elements of the crime that constitutes the form of suspension;there must be a causal relationship between the“damage”and the act;and the“damage”must be subjectively imputable.Secondly,the harm caused by the direct object of the harm is the basic connotation of“damage”.Finally,the harm caused by the practice is the cause of the harm in the punishment principle.

关 键 词：中止犯 处罚原则 损害 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]