互动视角下附加问句的信息类型、认识立场与交互功能——以标记为“是不是/是吧”的附加问句为例  

A study on the information types,epistemic stances and interactive functions of tag questions from the perspective of interaction:The case of tag questions marked with shibushi/shiba

作　　者：卢勇军 Lu Yongjun

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中国语言文学系

出　　处：《语言教学与研究》2020年第6期60-70,共11页Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies

摘　　要：根据Labov & Fanshel(1977:100)的A、B-events理论,附加问句所包括的事件信息可分为三类,皆为言者已知信息。言者对这三类已知信息知晓度高、确信度高。按“认识一致性原则”,认识立场(确信度)一般与认识状态(知晓度)是一致的,但认识立场常因交际需求与实际认识状态产生偏离。言者降低话轮尾附加问句的确信度,是为了建立互动以求取听者回应(“确认”和“同意”)。另外,附加问句的交互功能因其会话序列位置和事件信息类型的不同而有差异,三类交互功能间具有发展关系。In the light of Labov & Fanshel’s(1977:100) A-events and B-events theory, the event information of tag questions can be divided into three different types, all of which present known information to the speaker. The speaker’s familiarity and confidence of these three types of information are high. According to the principle of epistemic congruency, the epistemic stance(confidence of information) is convergent with the epistemic state(familiarity of information), but the epistemic stance is often divergent from "real" epistemic state for certain interactive purposes. The confidence of information of the tag questions which is distributed at the turn-final is reduced by the speaker to build interaction for seeking responses(confirmation and affirmation). In addition, the interactive function of tag questions differs with their distributions of the conversational sequence and their types of event information. The three kinds of interactive functions could be located at a grammaticalizational cline.

关 键 词：信息类型 话语结构 认识状态 认识立场 交互功能 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]