检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘东虹[1] Liu Donghong(Central China Normal University)
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学外语学院,湖北省武汉市430079
出 处:《现代外语》2020年第6期793-805,共13页Modern Foreign Languages
摘 要:本文旨在从己方论证和反方论证两个方面探讨中国英语学习者论证图式是否固化。采用基于Toulmin模式建立的新分析框架,对十五年前(30篇)与现今的大学生作文(27篇)进行纵向比较,并辅以访谈,调查现今学生对于己方论证和反方论证的看法。研究结果发现,两组作文都具有较强的己方论证充分性,特别是论证结构的深度和内嵌结构的数量十分相近。但是现今的学习者在反方论证的各项指标上都远远超过十五年前的学习者,能考虑到不同观点并进行反驳,其论证更有说服力。说明中国英语学习者论证图式已发生了变化。By studying myside argument and counter argument,this paper explores whether Chinese EFL learners’argumentation schemas are solidified.A new analytical framework was designed based on Toulmin Model.Text analysis involved 27 English argumentative essays of present college students and 30 essays of their counterparts 15 years ago.Interviews were further conducted to investigate present students’views on myside argument and counter argument.The results show that both groups produced sufficient myside arguments in terms of argument depth and number of embedded structure.However,the present students performed far better in using counter argument(including counterargument-claim,counterargument-data and rebuttal)and demonstrated a higher counterargument-data/data ratio.They attended to their readers’different views and offered rebuttals,thus promoting the persuasiveness of the essays.This suggests that Chinese EFL learners’argumentation schemas have been altered.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28