对自由民主制度失灵的矫正——福山稳定民主多元秩序论评析  

Correction of Failure of Liberal Democracy:Francis Fukuyama's Pluralistic Orders Theory of Stable Democracy

作　　者：国虹[1] GUO Hong(College of Humanities and Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期57-65,共9页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划资助项目(18CDCJ18);校行政管理专业核心课程优秀教学团队建设资助项目。

摘　　要：随着民主第三波高潮逐渐褪去,无论是新兴民主国家还是老牌发达民主国家都不同程度地遇到了许多亟待反思和解决的问题。正当自由民主制度陷入泥潭之时,中国自改革开放以来所取得的举世瞩目成就和中国政府的不俗表现吸引了世界的眼光。从最初对中国的否定式解读到主动探寻“中国经验”的主要内容,福山尝试并借鉴“中国经验”的“秩序与平衡”的理念构建了包括文化、社会伦理、经济、政治与身份秩序的稳定民主的多元秩序论。福山的这一理论回应了当代政治发展中出现的最新问题,推进了参与型民主式微背景下权力制衡的研究,但是仍旧不能挽救自由民主制度,至多是一场理想实验罢了。Both newly established democracies and developed democratic states had encountered many problems that need to be reflected and solved at different degrees with the fading of the third wave of democracy.The remarkable achievements of China since the reform and opening up and Chinese government's remarkable performance had attracted attention of the world when liberal democracy is in trouble.From interpreting to China negatively at the beginning to exploring the main contents of“China experience”actively,Fukuyama tried to drew on the experience of China and used the concept of“order and balance”to build a pluralistic orders theory of stable democracy including cultural,social ethics,economic,political,and identity orders.Fukuyama's theory responded to the latest problems in contemporary political development and promoted the study of power checks and balances in the context of participatory democracy with fading.However,it still cannot save liberal democracy.At best,it is an ideal experiment.

关 键 词：自由民主 中国经验 多元秩序 福山 

分 类 号：B152[哲学宗教—世界哲学] D07[政治法律—政治学]