以因果共犯论检视承继共犯的中国问题  

On China’s Problem of Succeeding Accomplice with the Theory of Causal Accomplice

作　　者：陈洪兵[1] CHEN hong-bing(School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期117-124,共8页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目:网络服务商刑事责任边界及体系构建研究(18BFX104);江苏省社区矫正损害修复项目研究基地专项资金;江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地资助(2015ZSJD002)。

摘　　要：承继共犯论争论的焦点在于,后行为人应否对前行为及其结果承担共犯的责任。完全肯定说因明显违反因果共犯论而如今鲜有支持者;限定肯定说因将后行为人认识并积极利用前行为引起的状态或者效果等同于后行为引起了该种状态或者效果,同样有违结果不能出现于原因行为之前的因果性常识,而不具有合理性。任何人都只对与自己行为具有因果性的法益侵害结果负责,因此,完全否定说可谓因果共犯论的必然归结。The focus of the theory of succeeding accomplice is whether the latter actor should bear the responsibility of accomplice to the former act and its result.There are few supporters because the total affirmative theory obviously violates the theory of causal accomplice;The finite affirmative theory is that the state or effect caused by the former behavior is equal to that caused by the latter behavior,which is also against the common sense of causality that the result cannot appear before the cause behavior,and is not reasonable;Anyone is only responsible for the result of infringement of legal interest which has causality with his own behavior.Therefore,the theory of total negation is the inevitable conclusion of the theory of causal accomplice.

关 键 词：承继共犯 因果共犯论 抢劫 绑架 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]