形式批评理论与现代《楚辞》研究范式——以《卜居》《渔父》研究为例  

Formal Criticism Theory and Modern Research Paradigm of Chu Ci-Take the Study of“Buju”and“The Fisherman”as Examples

作　　者：王汝虎 Wang Ruhu(College of Media,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao 276826,China)

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学传媒学院,日照276826

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期89-96,113,共9页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“古代诗学形式批评范畴与批评意识研究”(项目批准号:20YJC751029)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在现代《楚辞》研究中,对屈赋语辞与形式的厘定、体认和评判,是其中最为确实和重要的理论切入视野。特别是在《卜居》《渔父》作者真伪问题的讨论中,诸研究者既以古代训诂学为基础,又充分运用现代语言学、修辞学方法,对此二篇的散体韵文和主客问答体式进行了充分的阐释与考证,并涵括着对经典文本形成过程中形式审美和历史意识互动关系的揭示。而在微观层次上,通过句法、字法和韵法等形式批评理论来辨析文本细节,更是一种内在的研究范式。此种文学本位立场,显示了现代《楚辞》研究对包括形式主义、新批评、诠释学等西方理论的吸收,并以文本细读和形式批评为道德批评、文化批评和政治批评的前提和基础,故可谓近现代《楚辞》研究实践中最为内在和有效的研究范式之一。In the modern study of Chuci,the definition,recognition and evaluation of the words and forms of Qu's poetry are the most reliable and important theories.Especially in the discussion of the authenticity of the authors of“Buju”and“The Fisherman,”the researchers not only used ancient exegetics as the basis,but also made full use of modern linguistics and rhetoric methods to discuss the prose verse and subject and object of the two articles.The question-and-answer style fully explained and verified,and included the revealing of the interactive relationship between the aesthetics of form and historical consciousness in the formation of the classic text.At the micro level,it is even more an inherent research paradigm to analyze text details through formal criticism theories such as syntax,character and rhyme.This kind of literary standard position shows the absorption of modern Chuci research into Western theories including formalism,new criticism,and hermeneutics,and uses close reading and formal criticism as the prerequisite and basis for moral criticism,cultural criticism,and political criticism.Therefore,it can be regarded as one of the most internal and effective research paradigms in modern Chu Ci research practice.

关 键 词：《卜居》 《渔父》 形式批评 体式批评 句法批评 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]