我国采煤沉陷治理存在的突出问题和综合治理模式探讨  

Discussion on Prominent Issues in Coal Mining Subsidence Governance and Comprehensive Governance Model

作　　者：程爱国 潘海洋 Cheng Aiguo;Pan Haiyang(Exploration and Research Institute,CNACG,Beijing 100039;Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao,Shandong 266590)

机构地区：[1]中国煤炭地质总局勘查研究总院,北京100039 [2]山东科技大学,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《中国煤炭地质》2020年第9期93-98,共6页Coal Geology of China

基　　金：国家发展改革委东北等老工业基地振兴司研究课题资助(2017-13);中国煤炭地质总局科技创新资金项目资助(ZMKJ-2019-J03)。

摘　　要：我国采煤沉陷面积大,治理工作严重滞后,治理思路不清,监管体系不完善。将采煤沉陷划分为东北、京津冀、黄淮海、华南、晋陕蒙宁、云贵川渝、西北、青藏7个综合治理区,分区总结了采煤沉陷特征;在概括总结前人采煤沉陷治理经验和治理模式的基础上,提出了我国采煤沉陷综合治理基本途径和综合治理新思路,分别提出有责任主体采前、采中、采后治理模式和无责任主体生态城镇型、生态农业型、生态恢复型、生态旅游型4种综合治理模式。The coal mining subsidence features in China have issues of large area,governance work seriously lagged behind,governance thinking not clear,and monitoring system imperfect.The paper has partitioned coal mining subsidence in China into seven comprehensive governance areas of Northeast China,Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei,Huanghe-Huaihe-Haihe drainage basins,South China,Shanxi-Shaanxi-Inner Mongolia-Ningxia,Yunnan-Guizhou-Sichuan-Chongqing,Northwest China and Qinghai-Tibet.Every area coal mining subsidence features have been summed up.Based on summarization of previous coal mining subsidence governance experiences and governance models,proposed coal mining subsidence comprehensive governance basic approaches and new thoughts;respectively put forward subject of responsibility before,under,after mining governance models,as well as subject of irresponsibility eco-township,eco-agriculture,eco-restoration and eco-tourism four typed governance models.

关 键 词：采煤沉陷 综合治理模式 责任主体 

分 类 号：TD82[矿业工程—煤矿开采]