检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李弼仁 方俊锋[2] 张汉洪[1] LI Bi-Ren;FANG Jun-Feng;ZHANG Han-Hong(Hainan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Haikou 570203 Hainan,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405 Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]海南省中医院,海南海口570203 [2]广州中医药大学第一附属医院,广东广州510405
出 处:《广州中医药大学学报》2020年第11期2260-2265,共6页Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:海南省医药卫生科研项目(编号:16360101A2001)。
摘 要:检索国内外主要期刊数据库中有关中药擦浴降温治疗成人发热患者(试验组)对比常规物理降温方法治疗成人发热患者(对照组)的临床随机对照试验,采用Cochrane手册中的偏倚风险评估工具评价其文献质量,采用RevMan 5.3统计软件进行Meta分析,以评价中药擦浴降温效应的临床疗效及安全性。结果共纳入8篇临床随机对照试验,涉及患者606例。Meta分析结果显示,除治疗后30 min体温2组比较差异无统计学意义(MD=0.20,95%CI[-0.07,0.48],P=0.14)外,2组治疗后1 h体温(MD=-0.25,95%Cl[-0.43,-0.06],P=0.009)、治疗后1.5 h体温(MD=-0.70,95%Cl[-1.06,-0.34],P=0.001)、治疗后2 h体温(MD=-0.85,95%Cl[-0.97,-0.73],P<0.00001)、治疗后2.5 h体温(MD=-0.96,95%Cl[-1.65,-0.26],P=0.007)及总不良反应发生率(OR=0.30,95%Cl[0.18,0.52],P<0.0001)比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。根据分析结果可初步认为,中药擦浴降温比常规物理降温法具有更持久的疗效及更好的安全性,但因纳入的文献数量有限且部分文献质量较低,结论需高质量临床证据的进一步验证。The clinical randomized controlled trials of Chinese medicine sponging bath(trial group)vs conventional physical cooling method(control group)for the treatment of adult fever in the main domestic and oversea databases were reviewed.Tools for analysis of bias recommended by Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook were used for the evaluation of the quality of the literatures,and Revman 5.3 was adopted for the Meta-analysis.And then the clinical antipyretic effectiveness and safety of Chinese medicine sponging bath for the treatment of adult fever were systematically reviewed.The results showed that a total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included,and involved 606 cases.The results of Meta-analysis showed that except that the difference of 30-min body temperature between the trial group and the control group was insignificant(MD=0.20,95%CI[-0.07,0.48],P=0.14),there were statistically significant differences in the one-hour body temperature(MD=-0.25,95%Cl[-0.43,-0.06],P=0.009)the 1.5-hour body temperature(MD=-0.70,95%CI[-1.06,-0.34],P=0.001),the 2-hour body temperature(MD=-0.85,95%CI[-0.97,-0.73],P<0.00001),the 2.5-hour body temperature(MD=-0.96,95%CI[-1.65,-0.26],P=0.007)and the overall incidence of adverse reaction(OR=0.30,95%CI[0.18,0.52],P<0.0001)after treatment between the trial group and the control group.The analysis results preliminarily indicated that the Chinese medicine sponging bath exerts lasting efficacy and high safety than conventional physical cooling method for the treatment of adult fever.But for the small sample size and low quality of the included literature,the conclusion needs to be further verified by high-quality clinical evidence.
关 键 词:成人发热 中药擦浴 降温效应 安全性 随机对照试验 META分析
分 类 号:R255.1[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200