移动床纯氧连续气化与常压固定床间歇气化技术经济对比分析  

Technical economic comparison between moving bed pure oxygen continuous gasification and atmospheric fixed bed intermittent gasification

作　　者：王翔 关银龙 WANG Xiang;GUAN Yinlong(Shanxi Tianze Coal Chemical Co.Ltd.,Jincheng 048000,Shanxi Province)

机构地区：[1]山西天泽煤化工集团股份公司,山西晋城048000

出　　处：《氮肥技术》2020年第5期1-3,7,共4页Nitrogenous Fertilizer Technology

摘　　要：通过对移动床纯氧连续气化与常压固定床间歇气化在三度排放、能耗方面的比较,分析了移动床纯氧连续气化改造投资估算,指出移动床纯氧连续气化改造常压固定床间歇气化的优势.Based on the comparison of three wastes emission and energy consumption between moving bed pure oxygen continuous gasification and atmospheric fixed bed intermittent gasification,the investment estimation of moving bed pure oxygen continuous gasification retrofit is analyzed,and the advantages of moving bed pure oxygen continuous gasification retrofit from atmospheric fixed bed intermittent gasification are pointed out.

关 键 词：T-G技术 三废 能耗 对比 分析 投资 成本 效益 

分 类 号：TQ546[化学工程—煤化学工程]