互联网期货交易纠纷管辖权法律规则修正  

作　　者：涂明辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西省社会科学院法学研究所,江西南昌330077

出　　处：《企业经济》2020年第11期155-160,共6页Enterprise Economy

摘　　要：随着互联网在期货交易中的广泛应用,期货交易更容易打破传统地域界限,使得期货交易主体或客体经常涉及不同的国度或不同的法域,或者期货交易行为与结果发生在两个以上国家或法域。然而,互联网的虚拟性与全球性极大地冲击着传统管辖权的确定原则,修正管辖权连接点已经成为各国理论与立法实践的热点议题。比较一致的看法是,判断法院是否具有管辖权的标准是管辖法院与案件之间是否存在“最低联系”。我国《民诉法》和相关司法解释构建起了互联网期货交易纠纷的管辖规则体系,但未完全考虑互联网期货交易给管辖的确定所带来的挑战。在结合本国实际的基础上,应科学适度地参考域外“最低联系标准”规则,明确具体的适用方法、条件。With the extensive application of the Internet in futures trading,futures trading is more likely to break the traditional regional boundaries,making the subject or object of futures trading often involve different countries or different jurisdictions,or the behavior and result of futures trading occur in two or more countries or jurisdictions.However,the virtual and global nature of the Internet has greatly impacted the determination principle of the traditional jurisdiction,and the revision of the joint point of jurisdiction has become a hot topic in the theory and legislative practice of various countries.However,it is generally agreed that the criterion for determining whether a court has jurisdiction is whether there is a"minimum link"between the jurisdiction court and the case.China’s Civil Procedure Law and relevant judicial interpretations have constructed the jurisdiction rules system of Internet futures trading disputes,but they have not fully considered the challenges brought by Internet futures transactions to the determination of jurisdiction.On the basis of the actual situation of our country,we should refer to the foreign“minimum link rules”scientifically and appropriately,and clarify the specific application methods and conditions.

关 键 词：期货交易 互联网络 非对应性 管辖连接 

分 类 号：D922.28[政治法律—经济法学]