成果与局限:试论我国首次体育学术论争  

Achievements and Limitations:First Sports Academic Debates in China

作　　者：李凤梅[1] LI Fengmei(P.E College of Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450044, China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学体育学院,河南郑州450044

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2020年第11期34-40,共7页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(14CTY002);2020年度河南省高校青年骨干教师培养计划项目。

摘　　要：新中国成立初期体育学界的探索和体育事业的发展,为当代体育哲学社会科学发展提供了重要的经验启示和思想资源。出于复杂原因,当时被“双百”方针孕育而生的首次体育学术论争,鲜有人提及。在学界内外争鸣氛围的激励下,这次论争系统总结了当时体育发展中的基本问题,空前活跃了体育研究氛围,也促使篮球战术、体育内行与外行、武术渊源和发展等具体问题的讨论得以深入展开;而历史条件的特殊性和局限性,致使其偏离了体育场域且未能充分关注基本国情;从研究者的态度、论争者的遗憾和体育界的反思等层面,对我国首次体育学术论争及其深远影响进行研判。At the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China,the exploration of sports academic circles and the development of sports cause provided important experience enlightenment and ideological resources for the development of contemporary sports philosophy and social science.For complicated reasons,few people mentioned the first academic debate on physical education,which was bred by the policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools.Inspired by the atmosphere of debate,the basic problems in the development of sports at that time were summarized,bringing out active academic research atmosphere more than ever,and also promoting the discussion of basketball tactics,sports experts and laymen,the origin and development of martial arts,etc.However,due to the particularity and limitation of historical conditions,it finally deviated from the researches on sports and failed to take the national situation into consideration.The first sports academic debate in China and its far-reaching influence could be studied from the attitude of researchers,the regret of the debaters and the reflection of the sports field.

关 键 词：体育学术论争 体育问题 体育研究成果 体育研究局限 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]