检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秀萍 WANG Xiu-ping(Ningxia Police Officer Vocational College,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021,China)
出 处:《教育教学论坛》2020年第47期290-292,共3页Education And Teaching Forum
摘 要:作为法院审结案件的方式之一,撤诉的立法本意是充分尊重当事人的处分权,保护当事人诉讼利益和诉讼秩序的稳定。然而现行立法中对撤诉制度的规定,采用的是原告独立掌控撤诉申请权和法院单向地行使裁量权的运作程式,撤诉仅在原告和法院之间进行,漠视被告的程序主体地位和权益,导致撤诉中原被告之间权益严重失衡。文章拟从被告的权益保障为视角,对撤诉制度运行规范化中存在的一些重点问题进行探讨和分析,均衡原被告双方权益。As one of the ways for the court to conclude a case,the original legislative intention of withdrawing a lawsuit is to fully respect the disposition right of the parties and protect the interests of the parties and the stability of the litigation order.However,the current legislation on the withdrawal system adopts the operating procedure that the plaintiff independently controls the application right of withdrawal and the court unilaterally exercises the discretion.The withdrawal is only carried out between the plaintiff and the court,ignoring the defendant's procedural subject status and rights and interests,resulting in the serious imbalance of the rights and interests of the original defendant in the withdrawal.From the perspective of the protection of the rights and interests of the defendant,this paper intends to discuss and analyze some key issues existing in the standardization of the operation of the withdrawal system,so as to balance the rights and interests of the original defendant and both parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7