检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李霞 LI Xia(School of Law and Politics, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224000, China)
出 处:《长春大学学报》2020年第11期105-109,共5页Journal of Changchun University
基 金:江苏省教育厅项目(2017SJB1532)。
摘 要:错案责任追究制度在理论上存在一定的争论。在实践中,该制度存在“错案”认定标准模糊、追责的“结果论”倾向严重、责任追究程序机制不健全和责任主体认定难等方面的问题。错案责任追究制度有其存在的合理性和正当性。要建立健全错案责任追究制度,需要坚持主观过错和客观行为相结合的原则,明确错案责任追究的程序机制,坚持权责一致原则,确保“审理者裁判,裁判者负责”,坚持责任与保障相结合,保证法官的合法权益。There are some arguments theoretically about the system of investigating the responsibility of misjudged cases.In practice,there exist problems in the system,such as the vague identification standard of misjudged case,serious“result-only”tendency of accountability,imperfect procedure mechanism of responsibility investigation,and difficult identification of responsibility subject.The system of investigating the responsibility of misjudged cases has its rationality and legitimacy.In order to establish and improve the system of investigating misjudged cases,it is necessary to adhere to the principle of combining subjective fault with objective behavior,clarify the procedural mechanism of investigating misjudged cases,adhere to the principle of consistence of rights and responsibilities,ensure the fact that“the judge judges and the judge is responsible”,and adhere to the combination of responsibility and guarantee,so as to ensure the legitimate rights and interests of judges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.185.32