全球高校排名体系的比较与实证分析  

Comparison and Empirical Analysis Based on the Ranking System of Global Universities

作　　者：李碧静 LI Bijing(Development Planning and Education Evaluation Center,Guangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanning Guangxi 530200)

机构地区：[1]广西财经学院发展规划与教育评估中心,广西南宁530200

出　　处：《首都师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2020年第6期88-96,共9页Journal of Capital Normal University：Natural Science Edition

摘　　要：在中国“双一流”大学建设背景下,高校之间的竞争越来越激烈.为明确高校之间竞争力高低及其差距的主要来源,本研究以QS(Quacquarelli Symonds)、THE(Times Higher Education)、ARWU(Academic Ranking of World Universities)和USNEWS(US News&World Report)4种全球高校排名体系为基本框架,比较4种排名体系的异同,分析其构成因子,同时辅以中国9所“985工程”高校群和美国常春藤联盟大学群的实证分析.研究结果显示:全球4种高校排名机构均关注高校在教育质量、科研成果和教师质量3个方面的综合表现.因此,高校未来应从提升教育质量、科研成果和教师质量3个方面加强“双一流”大学建设.Under the background of"Double First-class"university construction in China,the competition among universities is becoming increasingly fierce.In order to clarify the main sources of competitiveness among universities and the gaps,this study used the four global ranking systems of QS(Quacquarelli Symonds),THE(Times Higher Education),ARWU(Academic Ranking of World Universities)and USNEWS(US News&World Report)as the basic framework,compared the similarities and differences of the four ranking systems,and analyzed their constituent factors.At the same time,it was supplemented by the empirical analysis of nine universities of"Project 985"in China and the Ivy League Colleges university group in the United States.The results showed that the four ranking institutions were concerned about the comprehensive performance of universities in three aspects of education quality,scientific research achievements and teacher quality.Therefore,in the future,colleges and universities should strengthen the construction of"Double First-class"universities from the aspects of improving the education quality,scientific research achievements and teacher quality.

关 键 词：一流大学 排名体系 比较 实证分析 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]