手针不同流派比较  

Comparison of different schools of hand acupuncture therapies

作　　者：王锐卿 张子迪 刘敬萱 贾春生 WANG Rui-qing;ZHANG Zi-di;LIU Jing-xuan;JIA Chun-sheng(School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina,Hebei University of CM,Shijiazhuang 050200,China)

机构地区：[1]河北中医学院针灸推拿学院,石家庄050200

出　　处：《中国针灸》2020年第11期1223-1228,共6页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目:81473773、81681260237;河北中医学院研究生创新资助项目:XCXZZSS2020024。

摘　　要：梳理手针疗法历史源流,比较目前应用较广泛的传统手针派、高丽手指针派、方氏手象针派等8个手针流派的定位方法、针刺手法、优势病种等,发现手针疗法存在定位方法不统一、针刺方法不统一、优势病种模糊等问题。未来研究中,要优化手针方案,寻找最佳全息象、针刺手法及量化标准,促进流派间的融合,形成相关规范,制定相关国家标准,以促进手针疗法的应用与发展。The historical origin of hand acupuncture therapies were collected. The positioning method, acupuncture manipulation and dominant diseases, etc. were compared among 8 kinds of extensively used hand acupuncture schools, such as traditional hand acupuncture, Korean finger needle and Fang’s hand image needle. It is found that the positioning method and needling method are not unified and the dominant diseases not specified. In the future study, the regimen of hand acupuncture should be optimized, the optimal holographic image, acupuncture manipulation and quantitative standards should be developed and the integration among schools should be promoted so that the relevant specifications can be formulated,national standards be developed and the application and development of hand acupuncture therapy be promoted.

关 键 词：手针疗法 流派研究 历史源流 针刺方法 

分 类 号：R245.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]