检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张洪武[1] 张敬芳 ZHANG Hongwu;ZHANG Jingfang(Institute of Scientific Socialism,Beijing Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100101;International Graduate School,Hanyang University,Seoul 04763)
机构地区:[1]北京市社会科学院科社所,北京100101 [2]韩国汉阳大学国际大学院,首尔04763
出 处:《长白学刊》2020年第6期36-44,共9页Changbai Journal
摘 要:在分配正义问题上存在各种不同的观点,平均主义否定了效率,自由至上主义则否定了公平,这些观点之所以不正确,就是因为它们只是从某个社会群体的视角看问题,而不是从社会作为一个有机体的视角看问题。问题在于,正义不是某个利益群体的概念,它是社会有机体平衡发展的概念。从社会作为一个有机体平衡发展的视角看,分配的正义观一面要坚持效率优先原则,另一面也要坚持弱平等原则,只有坚持效率优先原则,才会有公平,只有坚持弱平等原则,才会产生效率,它是效率基础上的公平与公平约束下的效率。There are different views on the issue of distributive justice, egalitarianism and libertarianism are two typical views. Equalitarianism denies efficiency, and libertarianism denies fairness. The reason why these views are not correct is that they only look at the problems from the perspective of a certain social group, not from the perspective of society as an organism. The problem is that justice is not the concept of a certain interest group, it is the concept of the balanced development of social organisms. From the perspective of the balanced development of society as an organism, the justice view of distribution must adhere to the principle of efficiency first, and the principle of weak equality on the other. Only by adhering to the principle of efficiency first can there be fairness, and only by adhering to the principle of weak equality can there be efficiency. It is fairness based on efficiency and efficiency under fairness constraint.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31