检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程庆华 侯珺 CHENG Qing-hua;HOU Jun(Department of Radiology,Ningde Hospital,Fujian Province,Fujian Ningde 352100)
机构地区:[1]福建省宁德市医院放射影像科,福建宁德352100
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2020年第21期48-49,64,共3页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:对比胸腹部创伤患者的DR与多层螺旋CT诊断结果,分析图像特征。方法:选择2018年1月~2020年8月收治的131例胸腹部创伤患者作为研究对象,均接受DR和螺旋CT检查,回顾性分析患者的临床资料并比较两种诊断方式的图像质量和诊断符合率。结果:螺旋CT检查成像质量明显优于DR成像质量(P<0.05);螺旋CT诊断符合率明显高于DR诊断符合率(92.37%vs72.52%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与DR相比,螺旋CT用于诊断胸腹部创伤时能提高更高的图像质量和准确率。Objective:To compare the diagnosis results of DR and multi-slice spiral CT in patients with thoracic and abdominal trauma,and to analyze the image characteristics.Methods:131 patients with thoracic and abdominal trauma from January 2018 to August 2020 were selected as the research subjects.All patients underwent DR and spiral CT examinations.The clinical data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed and the image quality and diagnosis conformity.Results:The imaging quality of spiral CT was significantly better than that of DR,P<0.05;the diagnostic coincidence rate of rotary CT was significantly higher than that of DR diagnosis(92.37%vs 72.52%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with DR,spiral CT can improve image quality and accuracy when used in the diagnosis of chest and abdomen trauma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.94.79