检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沙丹 SHA Dan(Mergency Department,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenyang Medical College,Liaoning Shenyang 110021)
机构地区:[1]沈阳医学院附属第二医院急诊科,辽宁沈阳110021
出 处:《中国医疗器械信息》2020年第21期91-92,共2页China Medical Device Information
摘 要:目的:探究不同胃管固定法对急诊昏迷患者非计划拔管的影响。方法:搜集2014年1月~2019年3月本院收治的115例急诊昏迷患者的病历资料进行回顾性分析,并依据胃管固定方式分为观察组(人型胃管固定)与对照组(F型胃管固定),对比两组患者胃管滑脱率及满意度,评价胃管固定效果。结果:观察组患者的满意度93.7%(59/63)显著高于对照组患者80.8%(42/52);观察组患者胃管滑脱率7.9%(5/63)显著低于对照组患者23.1%(12/52);各指标对比差异均有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:改良胃管固定对比传统胃管固定,胃管滑脱率低,患者满意度高,更适用于临床胃管固定。Objective:To explore the effects of different gastric tube fixation methods on unplanned extubation in patients with emergency coma.Methods:Collected the medical records of 115 emergency coma patients admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to March 2019 for retrospective analysis,and divided them into observation group(human-type gastric tube fixation)and control group(F type gastric tube fixation),compare the gastric tube slippage rate and satisfaction degree of the two groups of patients,and evaluate the effect of gastric tube fixation.Results:The satisfaction rate 93.7%(59/63)in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group 80.8%(42/52);The rate of gastric tube slippage in the observation group 7.9%(5/63)was significantly lower than that in the control group 23.1%(12/52).There was statistical significance in all indexes(P<0.05).Conclusion:When compares with traditional gastric tube fixation,modified gastric tube fixation has lower slippage rate and higher patient satisfaction rate,and it is more suitable for clinical gastric tube fixation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7