检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡晓鸿[1] 陈秀梅[1] 李雪梅[1] HU Xiaohong;CHEN Xiumei;LI Xuemei(Department of Nursing,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Institute of Heart,Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,Beijing 100029,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院-北京市心肺血管疾病研究所护理部,100029
出 处:《心肺血管病杂志》2020年第11期1364-1367,共4页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
摘 要:目的:比较“新媒体”患者管理方法与传统患者院外管理方法在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后患者自我管理能力提升与随访效果上的差异。方法:本研究采用随机对照研究,选取2018年1月至2018年12月,于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心外科接受CABG手术的患者298例,依据管理方法分组,比较院内主要并发症,术后随访效果及自我管理能力得分。结果:“新媒体”管理组患者院内平均花费更少,随访效果更理想,术后自我管理能力得分更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:“新媒体”管理方法可有效提高患者自我管理能力及术后随访效果。Objective:To evaluate the differences in improvements of self-management abilities and in the outcomes of follow-up tests for patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)under the“new media”patient management system,compared to the traditional extramural patient management system.Methods:This study uses a randomized controlled trial,sampling from 298 patients who have undergone CABG between Jan 2018 and Dec 2018,wherein samples are grouped by management system and evaluated based on major complications which arose during treatment in hospital,outcomes of follow-up tests,and im-provements in self-management abilities.Results:The“new media”management system yielded lesser expenses during treatment in hospital,more desirable follow-up test outcomes,and better self-management abilities.All three criteria produced statistically significant result(P<0.05).Conclusions:The“new media”management system is able to effectively improve CABG patients’self-management abilities,as well as follow-up test outcomes.
分 类 号:R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.190.174