明代黄佐《六艺流别》的文体学思想及其意义  

Cultural Thought and Meaning of Huang Zuo’s Six Arts in Ming Dynasty

作　　者：郑天熙[1] ZHENG Tianxi(College of Literature,South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510000)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学文学院,广东广州510000

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2020年第4期108-116,共9页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：国家社会科学重大招标项目“历代古文选本整理及研究”(17ZDA247);中国博士后基金第66批面上资助(2019M662963)。

摘　　要：明代黄佐的《六艺流别》将后世诸文体的源头溯源到《诗》《书》《礼》《乐》《春秋》《易》六经,认为它们都由六经衍变而来,区分文体演进的层级,揭示出文体之间的变异规律,构筑起以六经为纲领的文体谱系。《六艺流别》提出了与同时代其他文体学著作迥异的文体分类方式,展示出鲜明的文体学思想,包括文体本源论、文体发展论以及文体风格论等。《六艺流别》对文体变异运动的辩证认识,在明代文体学著作中独树一帜。同时,黄佐学宗程朱,《六艺流别》的文体学思想与黄佐的理学思想有密切联系。黄佐重申文源六经说,在明代中后期具有深刻的时代意义。Huang Zuo’s Six Arts in the Ming Dynasty traced the source of later generations of styles to Poetry,Book,Ritual,Music,Spring and Autumn and Yi.They were all derived from the Six Classics.Differentiating the level of stylistic evolution,revealing the variation laws between stylistic styles,and constructing the stylistic pedigree with the Six Classics as its program."Liu Yi Liu Bi"proposes a style classification method that is different from other literary style works of the same time,and shows distinctive stylistic ideas,including stylistic origin theory,stylistic development theory,and stylistic style theory.The dialectical understanding of the movement of stylistic variation in the Six Arts Stream is unique in the writings of the Ming Dynasty.At the same time,Huangzuoxuezongchengzhu,the literary thoughts of Six Arts are closely related to Huang Zuo’s Neo-Confucianism.Huangzuozhongshenwenyuan said that in the middle and late Jiajing of the Ming Dynasty,it had profound significance of the times.

关 键 词：黄佐 《六艺流别》 文体 文源六经 辨证统一 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]