从裁判立场谈贞操利益的民法保护  

Talking about the Civil Law Protection of Chastity Interests from the Referee's Position

作　　者：汪义双 Wang Yishuang(School of law,Ningxia University,Yinchuan Ningxia 750021)

机构地区：[1]宁夏大学法学院,宁夏银川750021

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2020年第5期12-16,共5页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：通过分析12则有关“贞操权”的司法案例,大多数裁判对于"贞操利益"的保护路径均有失妥当。有鉴于此,"贞操利益"应纳入一般人格权的范畴,从而适用一般人格权的保护路径,这有利于将目前不同的裁判立场予以统一,避免造成“同案不同判”的尴尬境地。Based on 12 judicial cases of“chastity right”,this paper summarizes the judgment opinions,obtains the judgment position of the court and analyzes the legal principles behind it,and holds that most of the judges are improper in the protection path of“chastity interest”.Therefore,“chastity interests”should be included in the category of general personality rights,so as to apply the protection path of general personality rights,which is conducive to unifying the current different judgment positions and avoiding the awkward.

关 键 词：贞操权 贞操利益 一般人格权 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]