对专利间接侵权制度理论构建的再思考  

Reconsideration of the Theoretical Development of the Indirect Patent Infringement System

作　　者：张初霞[1] 王东 Zhang Chuxia;Wang Dong

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学 [2]《中财法律评论》编辑部

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2020年第5期70-80,共11页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：依据专利间接侵权理论,专利权人得要求特定场合下的行为人对其尚未满足全面覆盖权利书所载全部技术特征的行为承担专利侵权的责任,这看似是对专利权人的扩大保护。但实质上,专利间接侵权应当属于专利侵权的一种情形,系对专利侵权制度的巩固与补充,这是对专利侵权进行实质解释的结果。行为人向第三人提供实施专利之相关产品时,明知该产品可用于实施专利且意图促使第三人实际实施,其行为的整个过程与专利直接侵权在法律上的评价无实质差异。通过对行为人实质性促使了第三人实际实施专利的整个过程进行评价,行为人所提供之物在主观恶性的支配下亦将落入专利保护范围之中,故专利间接侵权制度并未实质扩张对专利权的保护。According to the theory of indirect patent infringement,the patentee may require the actor in a particular situation to bear the liability for patent infringement in spite of acts which do not satisfy all the technical features contained in the full cover right document,which seems to be the extended protection of the patentee.But in essence,indirect patent infringement should be a form of patent infringement.It is the consolidation and supplement of the patent infringement system,which is the result of the substantial interpretation of patent infringement.There is no substantial difference between the legal evaluation of direct patent infringement and that of the whole process when the relevant product is provided to the third party with the knowledge that the product can be used for patent exploitation and the actor intends to induce the third party to actually explvit the patent.By evaluating the whole process that the actor virtually prompts the third party to actually exploit the patent,the actor's product will fall into the scope of patent protection under the subjective and vicious domination.Therefore,the system of indirect patent infringement does not extend the protection of patent right in essence.

关 键 词：专利间接侵权 全面覆盖原则 专利保护范围 实质解释 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]